Coventry Resources Limited; in the matter of Coventry Resources Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1473
The Court approved the share scheme and option scheme because all procedural requirements had been satisfied, the meetings were held in accordance with the orders, the constitution and the Corporations Act, statutory majorities were obtained, voters were fully informed, there was no evidence of bad faith, improper...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application Pursuant to S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Approve Schemes of Arrangement / Second Hearing
- Outcome
- Schemes of arrangement approved and exemption from compliance with s 411(11) granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['scheme of Arrangement' 'approval of Scheme of Arrangement' 'share Scheme' 'option Scheme' 'exemption From S 411(11) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth)']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Approve Schemes of Arrangement / Second Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether approval should be granted for the share scheme where all shares in Coventry will be transferred to Crescent Resources Corporation and shares in Crescent will be issued as consideration for the transfer.' 'Whether approval should be granted for the option scheme where all options to acquire shares in Coventry will be transferred to Crescent Resources Corporation and options to acquire shares in Crescent will be issued as consideration for the transfer.' 'Whether Coventry should be exempted pursuant to s 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) from compliance with s 411(11).']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the share scheme and option scheme because all procedural requirements had been satisfied, the meetings were held in accordance with the orders, the constitution and the Corporations Act, statutory majorities were obtained, voters were fully informed, there was no evidence of bad faith, improper purpose or minority oppression, the schemes were fair and reasonable, the independent expert concluded that the schemes were in the best interests of shareholders and optionholders, the conditions precedent were satisfied or waived, ASIC stated that it had no objection, and the schemes were not proposed to avoid Chapter 6 of the Corporations Act. The exemption from s 411(11) was...
Court Disposition
Schemes of arrangement approved and exemption from compliance with s 411(11) granted.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the scheme of arrangement between the plaintiff and its members, annexed and marked "A", is approved.' 'Pursuant to section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the scheme of arrangement between the plaintiff and the holders of certain...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment