Cowan Road Developer Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2024] NSWLEC 1211
The Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the modification application involved changes to aspects of the built form only, while the development remained a 25-dwelling multi dwelling housing development with basement parking and associated works in the same configuration as the development originally consented to, so the modified development was substantially the same development. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Application to Modify a Court Granted Development Consent / Orders Made Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Modification application approved subject to conditions; development consent consolidated as modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'multi Dwelling Housing' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Application to Modify a Court Granted Development Consent / Orders Made Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could approve the modification application under s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 following agreement between the parties.' 'Whether the development as modified would be substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the modification application involved changes to aspects of the built form only, while the development remained a 25-dwelling multi dwelling housing development with basement parking and associated works in the same configuration as the development originally consented to, so the modified development was substantially the same development. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Modification application approved subject to conditions; development consent consolidated as modified.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans and documents listed at paragraph 11 of this judgment.' 'The modification application relating to the development consent to development application DA 0270/22 is approved subject to the conditions at Annexure A.' 'As a consequence of Order (2), the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment