CP -v- New South Wales Ombudsman [2002] NSWADT 103
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the conduct of the Ombudsman's Office under s 55 of the PPIPA notwithstanding the immunity conferred by s 35A of the Ombudsman Act 1974, as the PPIPA is a later, specific statute providing an integrated scheme of obligations and review rights that modifies the general immunity provision for this limited purpose.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Jurisdictional Objection/preliminary Matter / Preliminary Determination on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Objection to jurisdiction dismissed; application to be relisted for further directions
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction of Tribunal Under Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998' 'immunity Provisions in Ombudsman Act 1974' "review of Disclosure of Personal Information by Ombudsman's Office"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Jurisdictional Objection/preliminary Matter / Preliminary Determination on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Administrative Decisions Tribunal has jurisdiction to review a decision of the Ombudsman's Office regarding alleged disclosure of personal information" 'Whether the immunity provided by s 35A of the Ombudsman Act 1974 excludes Tribunal review under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998']
Ratio Decidendi
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the conduct of the Ombudsman's Office under s 55 of the PPIPA notwithstanding the immunity conferred by s 35A of the Ombudsman Act 1974, as the PPIPA is a later, specific statute providing an integrated scheme of obligations and review rights that modifies the general immunity provision for this limited purpose.
Court Disposition
Objection to jurisdiction dismissed; application to be relisted for further directions
Orders
- ['The objection to jurisdiction is dismissed.' 'The application is to be relisted for further directions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment