CPK v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 151
On the balance of probabilities, CPK continues to abuse alcohol, remains involved in or perpetrates violence, lacks credible evidence of rehabilitation, and is likely to expose children to risk of harm or neglect; refusal of the Working With Children Check Clearance is the correct and preferable decision.
- Parties
- Applicant: CPK; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed; original decision affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Working With Children Check, Review of Refusal, Risk Assessment, Refusal of Clearance, Domestic Violence, Alcohol Abuse, Criminal Convictions, Public Safety
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CPK
Applicant
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CPK poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children within the meaning of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012
- 2 Whether the refusal of a Working With Children Check Clearance was the correct and preferable decision
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, CPK continues to abuse alcohol, remains involved in or perpetrates violence, lacks credible evidence of rehabilitation, and is likely to expose children to risk of harm or neglect; refusal of the Working With Children Check Clearance is the correct and preferable decision.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed; original decision affirmed.
Orders
- The decision of the Children's Guardian of 29 April 2016 refusing to grant CPK a Working With Children Check Clearance is affirmed.
- Broadcast or publication without the leave of the Tribunal of the name or other identifying information of CPK or any partner of CPK is prohibited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment