CPS v Children’s Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 237
The applicant established, on the balance of probabilities and based on all the evidence including expert psychological assessment and lack of subsequent offending, that he does not pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, satisfying the statutory test for the grant of an enabling order and a working with children check clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Enabling Order Regarding Working With Children Check / Final Determination/decision
- Outcome
- Application allowed; enabling order and WWCC clearance granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'assessment of Risk to Children' 'enabling Order for Disqualified Person']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Enabling Order Regarding Working With Children Check / Final Determination/decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012' 'Whether the applicant should be granted an enabling order and a working with children check clearance']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant established, on the balance of probabilities and based on all the evidence including expert psychological assessment and lack of subsequent offending, that he does not pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, satisfying the statutory test for the grant of an enabling order and a working with children check clearance.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; enabling order and WWCC clearance granted.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is not to be treated as a disqualified person for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012.' 'The Respondent is to grant the Applicant a working with children check clearance.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment