CQQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1353

CQQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1353

The Tribunal comprehensively considered and rejected the appellant's claims; no error in the primary judge's decision or the Tribunal's procedure; the grounds of appeal lacked substance.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'credibility Assessment' 'immigration Detention' 'persecution Claims']
['administrative Law' 'constitutional Law' 'human Rights Law'] ['judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'credibility Assessment' 'immigration Detention' 'persecution Claims']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Tribunal failed to consider all integers of the applicant's claims" "Whether the Tribunal's factual findings and rejection of claims about Shelton were proper" 'Whether the Tribunal complied with its obligations under the statutory regime']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal comprehensively considered and rejected the appellant's claims; no error in the primary judge's decision or the Tribunal's procedure; the grounds of appeal lacked substance.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to r 36.75(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed."]