CQY18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 2067

CQY18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 2067

The application was dismissed because the proposed appeal had no merit: the proposed ground was vague and unparticularised, did not establish appealable error by the Federal Circuit Court or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, and there was no apparent error in the Federal Circuit Court's conclusion that the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings were open on the material before it. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time and leave to appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Migration / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of a Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'adverse Credibility Findings']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'adverse Credibility Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of a Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an extension of time should be granted to bring an application for leave to appeal.' "Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Circuit Court's interlocutory decision." "Whether the proposed appeal had sufficient merit, including any arguable jurisdictional error or appealable error concerning the Tribunal's credibility findings."]

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the proposed appeal had no merit: the proposed ground was vague and unparticularised, did not establish appealable error by the Federal Circuit Court or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, and there was no apparent error in the Federal Circuit Court's conclusion that the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings were open on the material before it. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time and leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The name of the first respondent be changed to "Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs".' 'The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application."]