CR Operations Pty Ltd v Clark [2022] NSWSC 1555

CR Operations Pty Ltd v Clark [2022] NSWSC 1555

The plaintiff established a strong prima facie proprietary interest in the funds, which are proceeds from trust property after the defendant's management rights were terminated. The balance of convenience favours the plaintiff, given the liquid nature of the asset and the defendant's financial position, and there was insufficient evidence to justify permitting withdrawals for legal fees.

Parties
Plaintiff: CR Operations Pty Limited; Defendant: Timothy Clark
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory (ex Parte) Ruling
Outcome
Interlocutory injunction granted
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunction, Proprietary Interest, Asset Preservation, Trust Money
Equity Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunction Proprietary Interest Asset Preservation Trust Money

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CR Operations Pty Limited

Plaintiff

Timothy Clark

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory (ex Parte) Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie proprietary interest in money held in the defendant's bank account
  2. 2 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting an interlocutory injunction

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff established a strong prima facie proprietary interest in the funds, which are proceeds from trust property after the defendant's management rights were terminated. The balance of convenience favours the plaintiff, given the liquid nature of the asset and the defendant's financial position, and there was insufficient evidence to justify permitting withdrawals for legal fees.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction granted

Orders

  • The defendant is restrained until further order from withdrawing, or authorising withdrawal, of any funds from the specified Commonwealth Bank account.
  • Costs of the application be the plaintiff's costs in the cause.