Wilcock v Intense Concrete Constructions Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATAP 230
Leave to appeal was refused because the appellant failed to provide a transcript or recording of oral reasons, preventing the Appeal Panel from assessing whether the decision was against the weight of evidence, and the alleged new evidence did not meet the threshold for leave since it was not unavailable at the original hearing. No error of law or basis for leave was established.
- Parties
- Appellant: Craig Alan Wilcock; Respondent: Intense Concrete Constructions Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Weight of Evidence, New Evidence, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Craig Alan Wilcock
Appellant
Intense Concrete Constructions Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to appeal based on the decision being against the weight of evidence
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to appeal based on significant new evidence not reasonably available at the initial hearing
- 3 Whether the Tribunal member's expertise or comments affected the fairness of the original decision
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the appellant failed to provide a transcript or recording of oral reasons, preventing the Appeal Panel from assessing whether the decision was against the weight of evidence, and the alleged new evidence did not meet the threshold for leave since it was not unavailable at the original hearing. No error of law or basis for leave was established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to Appeal is refused.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment