Christian v R [2013] NSWCCA 98

Christian v R [2013] NSWCCA 98

The evidence of possession of the small brown bottle was not admissible except possibly as tendency evidence, for which proper notice and assessment were required but not done; its admission gave rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice, thus the appeal must be allowed, the conviction quashed, and a new trial ordered.

Parties
Appellant: Craig Anthony Christian; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction After Jury Trial
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
Legal Topics
Drugs, Possession, Admissibility of Evidence, Tendency Evidence, Miscarriage of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Craig Anthony Christian

Appellant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction After Jury Trial

  1. 1 Whether evidence of appellant's possession of a small brown bottle containing 1,4-Butanediol was wrongly admitted as evidence at trial
  2. 2 Whether the wrongly admitted evidence occasioned a miscarriage of justice requiring the conviction to be quashed
  3. 3 Whether the verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence of possession of the small brown bottle was not admissible except possibly as tendency evidence, for which proper notice and assessment were required but not done; its admission gave rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice, thus the appeal must be allowed, the conviction quashed, and a new trial ordered.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.

Orders

  • Quash the conviction of the Appellant
  • Order a new trial