Christian v R [2013] NSWCCA 98
The evidence of possession of the small brown bottle was not admissible except possibly as tendency evidence, for which proper notice and assessment were required but not done; its admission gave rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice, thus the appeal must be allowed, the conviction quashed, and a new trial ordered.
- Parties
- Appellant: Craig Anthony Christian; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction After Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Drugs, Possession, Admissibility of Evidence, Tendency Evidence, Miscarriage of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Craig Anthony Christian
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction After Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence of appellant's possession of a small brown bottle containing 1,4-Butanediol was wrongly admitted as evidence at trial
- 2 Whether the wrongly admitted evidence occasioned a miscarriage of justice requiring the conviction to be quashed
- 3 Whether the verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of possession of the small brown bottle was not admissible except possibly as tendency evidence, for which proper notice and assessment were required but not done; its admission gave rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice, thus the appeal must be allowed, the conviction quashed, and a new trial ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
Orders
- Quash the conviction of the Appellant
- Order a new trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment