James v Ash Electrical Services Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1112

James v Ash Electrical Services Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1112

For a statutory demand to be served at the registered office of a company under s 109X(1)(a) of the Corporations Act, it must be deposited at the premises comprising the registered office, not simply in a letterbox outside the building. There was no evidence the document was subsequently delivered inside or came to the defendant company’s attention; hence, service was not effected.

Parties
Plaintiff: Craig James; Defendant: Ash Electrical Services Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 October 2008
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up Application / Determination of Separate Question (service of Statutory Demand)
Outcome
Separate question answered 'No'—statutory demand was not served on the defendant at its registered office within the meaning of s 109X(1)(a).
Legal Topics
Winding Up on Grounds of Insolvency, Statutory Demand Service Requirements, Presumption of Insolvency Under S 459 C(2)(a) Corporations Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Craig James

Plaintiff

Ash Electrical Services Pty Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Corporations Winding Up Application / Determination of Separate Question (service of Statutory Demand)

  1. 1 Whether a statutory demand placed in an external letterbox constitutes service 'at' the registered office under s 109X(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether there was proof the statutory demand was subsequently received by the company

Ratio Decidendi

For a statutory demand to be served at the registered office of a company under s 109X(1)(a) of the Corporations Act, it must be deposited at the premises comprising the registered office, not simply in a letterbox outside the building. There was no evidence the document was subsequently delivered inside or came to the defendant company’s attention; hence, service was not effected.

Court Disposition

Separate question answered 'No'—statutory demand was not served on the defendant at its registered office within the meaning of s 109X(1)(a).