In the Matter of an election for an office in the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union Larner, Craig v Curry, Ian [1998] FCA 1450
No sufficient doubt or significance in the issues raised by the applicant; construction of union rules pertains to this union alone and does not merit leave to appeal; no arguable inconsistency with past decisions warrants leave.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'eligibility for Election of Union Officers' 'interpretation of Union Rules']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent was eligible for election under Rule 4(b)(iii)(1) of the Union's Rules" "Whether the interpretation of 'officer' in union rules includes salaried staff" 'Whether conflicting prior decisions warrant leave to appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
No sufficient doubt or significance in the issues raised by the applicant; construction of union rules pertains to this union alone and does not merit leave to appeal; no arguable inconsistency with past decisions warrants leave.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment