R v MAHER [2000] NSWCCA 147

R v MAHER [2000] NSWCCA 147

The sentencing judge did not err in applying the relevant sentencing principles, had sufficient regard to the applicant’s guilty pleas and psychological evidence, was justified in applying general deterrence, and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive nor outside the range of proper judicial discretion.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Craig Maher
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 April 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Appeals, Guilty Pleas, General Deterrence, Recidivism

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Craig Maher

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge gave adequate recognition to guilty pleas
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge properly considered the likelihood of re-offending based on psychological report
  3. 3 Whether general deterrence was appropriately considered given applicant's borderline intellectual functioning

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not err in applying the relevant sentencing principles, had sufficient regard to the applicant’s guilty pleas and psychological evidence, was justified in applying general deterrence, and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive nor outside the range of proper judicial discretion.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against sentence granted.
  • Appeal against sentence dismissed.