Meyrick v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 209
The Tribunal did not fail to consider the effect of non-revocation on the appellant's step-daughter, Ebony Bond; any consideration was subsumed in the findings regarding family and immediate family hardship, and the Tribunal's reasons and process demonstrated requisite consideration, so no jurisdictional error was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Dismissal of Judicial Review Application
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['visa Cancellation' 'judicial Review' 'direction No 65' 'jurisdictional Error' 'family Ties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Dismissal of Judicial Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the effect of non-revocation on the appellant's adult step-daughter, Ebony Bond" 'Whether the primary judge erred in not finding jurisdictional error on this basis']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not fail to consider the effect of non-revocation on the appellant's step-daughter, Ebony Bond; any consideration was subsumed in the findings regarding family and immediate family hardship, and the Tribunal's reasons and process demonstrated requisite consideration, so no jurisdictional error was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal to be taxed if not agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment