Everett v Ulan Coal Mines Limited (No 2) [2015] NSWDC 80
Because the plaintiff's alleged closed periods of incapacity both fell within the first 26 weeks after the injury and the award did not exceed the current weekly wage rate of $1022.04, the earlier award was confirmed and the stay rescinded; the earlier remarks were clarified as not stating that the current weekly wage rate is the maximum payable at all times except insofar as it caps the statutory rate after the first 26 weeks.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Workers Compensation Proceeding / Defendant's Application Following Earlier Reasons and Award
- Outcome
- Award confirmed; stay rescinded; defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application on a refresher basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['coal Miners' 'partial Incapacity Payments' 'first 26 Weeks of Incapacity' 'current Weekly Wage Rate' 'statutory Rate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Workers Compensation Proceeding / Defendant's Application Following Earlier Reasons and Award
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether remarks in the earlier reasons should be clarified because they might suggest that the current weekly wage rate was the maximum payable under s 11(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1926 at any time.' 'Whether the award previously made should be confirmed and the stay rescinded.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the plaintiff's alleged closed periods of incapacity both fell within the first 26 weeks after the injury and the award did not exceed the current weekly wage rate of $1022.04, the earlier award was confirmed and the stay rescinded; the earlier remarks were clarified as not stating that the current weekly wage rate is the maximum payable at all times except insofar as it caps the statutory rate after the first 26 weeks.
Court Disposition
Award confirmed; stay rescinded; defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application on a refresher basis.
Orders
- ['Award made on 6 January 2015 confirmed.' 'Stay made on 6 January 2015 rescinded.' "Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of application on a refresher basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment