Crayford Freight Services Ltd v Coral Seatel Navigation Co & Ors [1998] FCA 263

Crayford Freight Services Ltd v Coral Seatel Navigation Co & Ors [1998] FCA 263

The court held that the failure to seek leave to file a cross claim out of time was a formal defect or irregularity under s 51 of the Federal Court Act and could be cured by an order nunc pro tunc; it was premature to strike out Crayford's cross claim against Contship as discovery was incomplete, and the cross claim was not clearly hopeless.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 March 1998
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to File Cross Claim Out of Time and Summary Judgment
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
['summary Judgment' 'leave to File Cross Claim' 'procedural Irregularity' 'remedial Discretion']
['practice and Procedure'] ['summary Judgment' 'leave to File Cross Claim' 'procedural Irregularity' 'remedial Discretion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to File Cross Claim Out of Time and Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a cross claim filed out of time without leave is a nullity or may be validated nunc pro tunc after principal proceedings have been discontinued' 'Whether the cross claim against the third respondent, Contship, should be struck out for disclosing no cause of action']

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the failure to seek leave to file a cross claim out of time was a formal defect or irregularity under s 51 of the Federal Court Act and could be cured by an order nunc pro tunc; it was premature to strike out Crayford's cross claim against Contship as discovery was incomplete, and the cross claim was not clearly hopeless.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Orders made at first instance set aside.' 'Motion filed 19 August 1997 dismissed.' 'Leave granted to appellant to file its cross claim nunc pro tunc with effect from 22 July 1997.' 'Matter remitted to the primary judge for further directions in relation to the cross claim and its hearing...