CRC16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 663

CRC16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 663

The appellant failed to establish that the Tribunal’s findings were made without a logical and probative basis or that any jurisdictional error occurred; the Tribunal’s findings were open on the evidence and the reasoning disclosed intelligible justification.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Federal Court Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'adverse Credibility Findings' 'country Information Assessment']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'adverse Credibility Findings' 'country Information Assessment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal / Federal Court Appeal From Federal Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal made findings without a logical and probative basis' "Whether the Tribunal's findings were illogical or irrational" 'Whether adverse credibility findings involved jurisdictional error']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to establish that the Tribunal’s findings were made without a logical and probative basis or that any jurisdictional error occurred; the Tribunal’s findings were open on the evidence and the reasoning disclosed intelligible justification.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed with costs as agreed or assessed.' 'The Administrative Appeals Tribunal be added as the second respondent.' "The name of the first respondent be changed to 'Minister for Home Affairs'."]