Re Ronald Kevin Cash Ex parte Ronald Kevin Cash and Ivor Worrell Re Ronald Kevin Cash Ex parte Tilemakers Australia Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 750

Re Ronald Kevin Cash Ex parte Ronald Kevin Cash and Ivor Worrell Re Ronald Kevin Cash Ex parte Tilemakers Australia Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 750

Mr Worrell's election as chairman was invalid because, as an observer holding no proxy, he was not participating in the meeting in the relevant statutory sense. However, the invalid appointment did not require the meeting to be reconvened because the creditors had considered the debtor's proposal and expressed their will, and the alleged conduct of the meeting did not show that the debtor was denied a proper opportunity to deal with the proposal. The debtor's application was dismissed and, there being no basis to adjourn the petition, a sequestration order was made.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 September 1995
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Hearing of Debtor's Application Under S.30 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 Concerning a Creditors' Meeting and Hearing of Creditor's Petition for Sequestration
Outcome
The debtor's application was dismissed and the estate of Ronald Kevin Cash was sequestrated.
Legal Topics
["creditors' Meeting" 'appointment of Chairman' "debtor's Proposal" 'deed of Assignment' 'sequestration Order' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy / Hearing of Debtor's Application Under S.30 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 Concerning a Creditors' Meeting and Hearing of Creditor's Petition for Sequestration

  1. 1 ["Whether an observer who was not a creditor, proxy or attorney was eligible to be elected chairman of the creditors' meeting." 'Whether the chairman conducted the meeting with apparent bias or in a manner that denied the debtor a proper opportunity to present his proposal.' "Whether the creditors' meeting should be reconvened or treated as not concluded." "Whether the creditor's petition should proceed to a sequestration order."]

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Worrell's election as chairman was invalid because, as an observer holding no proxy, he was not participating in the meeting in the relevant statutory sense. However, the invalid appointment did not require the meeting to be reconvened because the creditors had considered the debtor's proposal and expressed their will, and the alleged conduct of the meeting did not show that the debtor was denied a proper opportunity to deal with the proposal. The debtor's application was dismissed and, there being no basis to adjourn the petition, a sequestration order was made.

Court Disposition

The debtor's application was dismissed and the estate of Ronald Kevin Cash was sequestrated.

Orders

  • ['The application of the debtor be dismissed.' 'The estate of Ronald Kevin Cash be sequestrated.' "The petitioning creditor's costs of and incidental to the hearing on the petition and including reserved costs be taxed and paid as petitioning creditor's costs."]