Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Jeans, in the matter of Jeans [2006] FCA 693
Balancing the interests of justice, with a real triable issue in concurrent proceedings and undertakings to protect the estate, a short adjournment is warranted to allow updated financial affidavit and further consideration before making or dismissing a sequestration order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Return of Petition for Final Hearing; Interim Order and Adjournment
- Outcome
- adjournment granted
- Legal Topics
- ["creditor's Petition" 'adjournment for Concurrent Proceedings' 'sequestration Order' 'sufficient Cause Under Bankruptcy Act S 52(2)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Return of Petition for Final Hearing; Interim Order and Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a sequestration order should be made or adjourned when concurrent proceedings regarding alleged fraud/forgery are ongoing' 'Whether there is sufficient cause under s 52(2) Bankruptcy Act not to make a sequestration order']
Ratio Decidendi
Balancing the interests of justice, with a real triable issue in concurrent proceedings and undertakings to protect the estate, a short adjournment is warranted to allow updated financial affidavit and further consideration before making or dismissing a sequestration order.
Court Disposition
adjournment granted
Orders
- ['The debtor is to file and serve an affidavit on or before 4 pm on 11 April 2006 specifying his assets and liabilities as at the date of swearing and material changes since his affidavit of 2 February 2005.' 'Proceedings stood over to 12 April 2006 at 4.30 pm or such other time as notified.' 'Costs are reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment