Re Robertson, J.W. v Ex parte Briggs, N.P. [1995] FCA 371
There is an unpaid debt of $3058.05 owed by Mr Robertson to Mr Briggs arising from a valid costs order. Neither alleged champerty nor minor procedural irregularities undermine the existence of the debt or justify dismissing the creditor's petition. No substantial injustice has resulted from any procedural defect.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Adjournment of Creditor's Petition
- Outcome
- adjournment
- Legal Topics
- ["creditor's Petition" 'costs Orders' 'champerty' 'act of Bankruptcy' 'irregularity Under Bankruptcy Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Adjournment of Creditor's Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a sequestration order should be made against Mr Robertson for unpaid costs in the sum of $3058.05 arising from a Supreme Court order' 'Whether alleged champerty or role of creditor affects existence of debt for bankruptcy purposes' 'Whether defects or irregularities in the petition procedure cause substantial injustice under s. 306 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966']
Ratio Decidendi
There is an unpaid debt of $3058.05 owed by Mr Robertson to Mr Briggs arising from a valid costs order. Neither alleged champerty nor minor procedural irregularities undermine the existence of the debt or justify dismissing the creditor's petition. No substantial injustice has resulted from any procedural defect.
Court Disposition
adjournment
Orders
- ["The creditor's petition is adjourned until 9.30 am on 20 June 1995." 'The costs of today are reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment