Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Conley, in the matter of Conley [2006] FCA 1011
There is no sufficient cause to not make a sequestration order, as Mr Conley is insolvent and his Supreme Court proceedings are not sufficiently advanced to justify withholding the order under s 52(2)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
- Parties
- Applicant Creditor: Commonwealth Bank of Australia; Respondent Debtor: Stephen Conley
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Petition / Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- sequestration order made against the estate of Stephen Conley
- Legal Topics
- Creditor's Petition, Sequestration Order, Cross Claim, Mortgagee's Power of Sale, Equitable Relief, Contracts Review Act 1980 (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Applicant Creditor
Stephen Conley
Respondent Debtor
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition / Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a sequestration order should be made against the estate of Stephen Conley
- 2 Whether sufficient cause exists under s 52(2)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for not making the order
- 3 Whether Mr Conley has a bona fide cross-claim against the bank
Ratio Decidendi
There is no sufficient cause to not make a sequestration order, as Mr Conley is insolvent and his Supreme Court proceedings are not sufficiently advanced to justify withholding the order under s 52(2)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Court Disposition
sequestration order made against the estate of Stephen Conley
Orders
- A sequestration order be made against the estate of Stephen Conley.
- The applicant creditor's costs, including any reserved costs, be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment