Re Bachmann, C. v. Ex parte Doran, E. [1987] FCA 496
The debtor discharged the onus of proving solvency and ability to pay debts by adducing evidence of sufficient assets, thus bringing him within s.52(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The petition was dismissed as the court exercised its discretion in favour of the debtor.
- Parties
- Petitioning Creditor: Ethel Doran; Debtor: Clemens Bachmann
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Petition / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed; costs awarded as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Creditors Petition, Sequestration, Debtor Solvency, Costs Under Bankruptcy Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ethel Doran
Petitioning Creditor
Clemens Bachmann
Debtor
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a sequestration order ought to be made under a creditor’s petition when debtor is able but unwilling to pay debts
- 2 Whether debtor has discharged the onus of proving solvency under s 52(2) Bankruptcy Act 1966
- 3 Appropriate orders as to costs
Ratio Decidendi
The debtor discharged the onus of proving solvency and ability to pay debts by adducing evidence of sufficient assets, thus bringing him within s.52(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The petition was dismissed as the court exercised its discretion in favour of the debtor.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed; costs awarded as specified.
Orders
- The petition be dismissed.
- Debtor to pay petitioning creditor's costs of and incidental to petition up to 17 June 1987 when the debtor's affidavit was served on the petitioning creditor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment