Bride R v Anderson Rice [1994] FCA 1064

Bride R v Anderson Rice [1994] FCA 1064

Where partners in a firm have changed between the date of a judgment and the filing of a creditor's petition, and there is no evidence of assignment of the debt to new partners, a sequestration order cannot be made since not all petitioners are creditors.

Parties
Debtor: Robert Bride; Petitioning Creditor: Anderson Rice (A Firm)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 December 1994
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Creditor's Petition, Judgment Debt, Partnership Law, Firm Names in Litigation, Assignment of Debt
Bankruptcy Creditor's Petition Judgment Debt Partnership Law Firm Names in Litigation Assignment of Debt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Bride

Debtor

Anderson Rice (A Firm)

Petitioning Creditor

Procedural Posture

Creditor's Petition / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a creditor's petition is validly brought when the partnership constituting the creditor has changed constituent partners between judgment and petition without evidence of debt assignment
  2. 2 Whether the petition should be dismissed due to lack of standing

Ratio Decidendi

Where partners in a firm have changed between the date of a judgment and the filing of a creditor's petition, and there is no evidence of assignment of the debt to new partners, a sequestration order cannot be made since not all petitioners are creditors.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition is dismissed.
  • The petitioning creditor is to pay the debtor's costs of the petition, including any reserved costs.