ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR NEW SOUTH WALES v UNITED TELECASTERS [1990] NSWCA 11
United Telecasters was found guilty of contempt as the broadcast of confessional material and accompanying images was likely to prejudice the fair trial of an accused and constituted a clear and serious interference with the administration of justice; penalty determined after considering mitigating and aggravating factors.
- Parties
- Claimant: Attorney General for New South Wales; Opponent: United Telecasters Sydney Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Proceedings / Judgment and Orders After Admission of Contempt; Determination of Penalty
- Outcome
- Declaration of contempt; financial penalty imposed; costs awarded
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Contempt, Media Publication, Pretrial Publicity, Fair Trial Rights, Confession, Penalty for Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General for New South Wales
Claimant
United Telecasters Sydney Limited
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Proceedings / Judgment and Orders After Admission of Contempt; Determination of Penalty
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the broadcast by United Telecasters amounted to contempt of court by prejudicing the fair trial of Paul Gerald Mason through publication of confessional material
- 2 What penalty, if any, should be imposed for the admitted contempt
Ratio Decidendi
United Telecasters was found guilty of contempt as the broadcast of confessional material and accompanying images was likely to prejudice the fair trial of an accused and constituted a clear and serious interference with the administration of justice; penalty determined after considering mitigating and aggravating factors.
Court Disposition
Declaration of contempt; financial penalty imposed; costs awarded
Orders
- Leave for opponent to file late affidavit and maintain confidentiality of exhibits
- Declaration that United Telecasters is guilty of contempt for the subject broadcast
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment