Nicholas v Astute Hire Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 711
There is sufficient evidence on a prima facie basis that Ontrack owed a duty of care and potentially was negligent, and that its liability is one which is arguably covered by the relevant insurance policy as required under s 601AG Corporations Act, satisfying the threshold for granting leave to cross-claim.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to File Cross Claim / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Cross Claim)
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the defendant to file and serve the proposed cross-claim on QBE Insurance Australia Limited. Costs of and incidental to the application are the applicant/defendant's costs in the cause, subject to any further counsel submissions.
- Legal Topics
- ['cross Claims' 'joinder of Parties' 'claims Against Insurers of Deregistered Companies' 'workplace Accident' 'liability of Subcontractor' 'insurance Coverage Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to File Cross Claim / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Cross Claim)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the defendant to file and serve a cross-claim against the insurer of a deregistered company under s 601AG Corporations Act 2001' 'Whether a prima facie case of liability against Ontrack was made out to support such a cross-claim' 'Whether the insurance policy covered the relevant liability']
Ratio Decidendi
There is sufficient evidence on a prima facie basis that Ontrack owed a duty of care and potentially was negligent, and that its liability is one which is arguably covered by the relevant insurance policy as required under s 601AG Corporations Act, satisfying the threshold for granting leave to cross-claim.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the defendant to file and serve the proposed cross-claim on QBE Insurance Australia Limited. Costs of and incidental to the application are the applicant/defendant's costs in the cause, subject to any further counsel submissions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to Astute Hire Pty Ltd to file and serve upon QBE Insurance Australia Limited the proposed Cross-Claim, a copy of which was marked MFI-1 dated 15 May 2015.' "Subject to any matter counsel may wish to raise, costs of and incidental to the application for leave to file the proposed Cross-Claim are...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment