Freeman and Anor v Kellerberrin Farmers Co-Operative Company Limited and Ors [2003] NSWSC 1105
The balance of convenience, including the location of most witnesses and the contractual jurisdiction clause favoring Western Australia, justified exercising discretion to transfer the proceedings to the Supreme Court of Western Australia.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Transfer of Proceedings (cross Vesting)
- Outcome
- Proceedings transferred to the Supreme Court of Western Australia; costs of proceedings to date to be costs in the transferred proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- ['cross Vesting' 'jurisdiction Clause' 'transfer of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Transfer of Proceedings (cross Vesting)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings should be transferred to the Supreme Court of Western Australia under the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987' 'Applicable principles for exercising discretion to transfer proceedings' 'Impact of a jurisdiction clause in contract on the transfer application']
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of convenience, including the location of most witnesses and the contractual jurisdiction clause favoring Western Australia, justified exercising discretion to transfer the proceedings to the Supreme Court of Western Australia.
Court Disposition
Proceedings transferred to the Supreme Court of Western Australia; costs of proceedings to date to be costs in the transferred proceedings.
Orders
- ['Transfer the proceedings to the Supreme Court of Western Australia' 'Costs of the proceedings to date be costs in the transferred proceedings']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment