Century Insurance Ltd (in provisional liq) & Ors v The New Zealand Guardian Trust Ltd & Ors The New Zealand Guardian Trust Ltd & Anor v Gunson, David [1997] FCA 1020
The court held that amendment of the cross claim should be allowed to reflect the settlement, as policy considerations favour a tortfeasor settling out of court and seeking contribution. The motion to dismiss was refused, and the appropriateness of the forum had already been determined and need not be revisited.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Century Insurance Limited (in provisional liquidation); Second Applicant: Edward John Bebbington; Second Applicant: Delores Edna Bebbington; First Respondent: New Zealand Guardian Trust Limited; Second Respondent: NZI International Trustee Company Limited; Third Respondent: Donald Andrews Davies; First Cross Claimant: New Zealand Guardian Trust Limited; Second Cross Claimant: NZI International Trustee Company Limited; Cross Respondent: David Gunson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Dismiss Cross Claim / Post Settlement, Directions for Amendment and Hearing
- Outcome
- Motion to dismiss cross claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Cross Claims, Contribution and Indemnity, Settlement, Forum Appropriateness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Century Insurance Limited (in provisional liquidation)
First Applicant
Edward John Bebbington
Second Applicant
Delores Edna Bebbington
Second Applicant
New Zealand Guardian Trust Limited
First Respondent
NZI International Trustee Company Limited
Second Respondent
Donald Andrews Davies
Third Respondent
New Zealand Guardian Trust Limited
First Cross Claimant
NZI International Trustee Company Limited
Second Cross Claimant
David Gunson
Cross Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion to Dismiss Cross Claim / Post Settlement, Directions for Amendment and Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cross claim should be dismissed following settlement of principal proceedings
- 2 Whether the cross claim can be amended to reflect the settlement
- 3 Whether the Federal Court is an appropriate forum for the resolution of the cross claim
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that amendment of the cross claim should be allowed to reflect the settlement, as policy considerations favour a tortfeasor settling out of court and seeking contribution. The motion to dismiss was refused, and the appropriateness of the forum had already been determined and need not be revisited.
Court Disposition
Motion to dismiss cross claim dismissed
Orders
- The cross respondent's motion dated 14 August 1997 is dismissed
- The cross respondent pay the cross claimant's costs of the motion to be taxed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment