Regina v Manton [2005] NSWCCA 58

Regina v Manton [2005] NSWCCA 58

By majority, the Court dismissed the appeal because, although the delay in complaint, uncertainty about dates and other features of the complainant's evidence caused concern, the trial judge had properly directed the jury about those difficulties and the case turned critically on the credibility of the complainant and the appellant. Giving full allowance to the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing both witnesses, the majority was not satisfied that the verdict was unreasonable, unsupported by the evidence, or that there was a significant possibility that an innocent person had been convicted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Appeal to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal From a District Court Jury Verdict
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['unsafe or Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'unreasonable Verdict or Verdict Unsupported by Evidence' 'sexual Assault' 'delayed Complaint' 'jury Advantage in Seeing and Hearing Witnesses' 'credibility Assessment']
['criminal Law' 'criminal Procedure' 'evidence'] ['unsafe or Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'unreasonable Verdict or Verdict Unsupported by Evidence' 'sexual Assault' 'delayed Complaint' 'jury Advantage in Seeing and Hearing Witnesses' 'credibility Assessment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Appeal to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal From a District Court Jury Verdict

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the jury's guilty verdict for sexual assault was unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence." "Whether delay in complaint, uncertainty about the date of the offence, absence of corroboration and the appellant's sworn denial made the conviction unsafe or unsatisfactory." "Whether the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing the complainant and the appellant was capable of resolving doubts arising from the record."]

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the Court dismissed the appeal because, although the delay in complaint, uncertainty about dates and other features of the complainant's evidence caused concern, the trial judge had properly directed the jury about those difficulties and the case turned critically on the credibility of the complainant and the appellant. Giving full allowance to the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing both witnesses, the majority was not satisfied that the verdict was unreasonable, unsupported by the evidence, or that there was a significant possibility that an innocent person had been convicted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed.']