R v Woods [2009] NSWCCA 55

R v Woods [2009] NSWCCA 55

The sentencing process miscarried as the sentences imposed, both individually and collectively, failed to adequately reflect the objective gravity and total criminality involved in multiple serious child sexual offences, requiring intervention and resentencing to ensure appropriate punishment and deterrence; a greater discount for cooperation and early plea was warranted given the offences came to light only due to the respondent's admissions.

Parties
Appellant: Crown; Respondent: Jacob Charles Woods
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Resentencing After Appeal Allowed
Outcome
Crown appeal allowed. Respondent resentenced.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Crown Appeals, Sexual Offences Against Children
Criminal Law Sentencing Crown Appeals Sexual Offences Against Children

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown

Appellant

Jacob Charles Woods

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Crown Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Resentencing After Appeal Allowed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly inadequate
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness and structuring of sentences
  3. 3 Appropriate level of discount for plea of guilty and cooperation

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing process miscarried as the sentences imposed, both individually and collectively, failed to adequately reflect the objective gravity and total criminality involved in multiple serious child sexual offences, requiring intervention and resentencing to ensure appropriate punishment and deterrence; a greater discount for cooperation and early plea was warranted given the offences came to light only due to the respondent's admissions.

Court Disposition

Crown appeal allowed. Respondent resentenced.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed and sentences imposed by the sentencing judge (except for certain summary offences) quashed.
  • Confirmed all sentences under s 167 of Criminal Procedure Act 1986 except the sentence for exhibiting an R-rated film to a minor, which was replaced with a $500 fine.