R v Kinghorn [2021] NSWCCA 313
Neither the accusatorial principle nor the companion rule operated to prohibit lawful dissemination or use of compelled taxation examination material prior to charges being laid, and clear statutory provisions (s 3G, s 355-70, s 355-175 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth)) authorised such disclosure and post-charge use. The common law protections are not constitutionally entrenched and can be abrogated by express or necessarily intended statute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['accusatorial Principle' 'companion Rule' 'disclosure of Compulsory Examination' 'federal Dishonesty Offences' 'taxation Law' 'use of Evidence in Prosecution']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does the accusatorial principle and companion rule prevent investigative and prosecuting authorities from disseminating, accessing, or using compelled answers under taxation legislation?' 'Are transcripts from compulsory tax examinations admissible in criminal trials?' 'Are legislative provisions permitting disclosure of such material invalid on constitutional grounds regarding fair trial or s 80 of the Constitution?']
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the accusatorial principle nor the companion rule operated to prohibit lawful dissemination or use of compelled taxation examination material prior to charges being laid, and clear statutory provisions (s 3G, s 355-70, s 355-175 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth)) authorised such disclosure and post-charge use. The common law protections are not constitutionally entrenched and can be abrogated by express or necessarily intended statute.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Set aside answers given by Adamson J on 23 October 2020 to the separate questions for determination.' 'Substitute answers: The accusatorial principle and companion rule do not prohibit dissemination, access, or use of compelled examination material where prosecution for s 135.1(7) Criminal Code (Cth) offences may...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment