R v Crumpton (No. 2) [2017] NSWCCA 3

R v Crumpton (No. 2) [2017] NSWCCA 3

Given the respondent's stable personal circumstances, strong family and community support, low risk of reoffending, suitability assessment and undertaking to comply with Intensive Correction Order, the sentence should be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order subject to mandatory conditions.

Parties
Applicant: Crown; Respondent: John Patrick Crumpton
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing
Outcome
Respondent sentenced to a total two year period of imprisonment, to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.
Legal Topics
Intensive Correction Order, Sentencing
Criminal Law Intensive Correction Order Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown

Applicant

John Patrick Crumpton

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent should be sentenced to an Intensive Correction Order instead of full-time imprisonment

Ratio Decidendi

Given the respondent's stable personal circumstances, strong family and community support, low risk of reoffending, suitability assessment and undertaking to comply with Intensive Correction Order, the sentence should be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order subject to mandatory conditions.

Court Disposition

Respondent sentenced to a total two year period of imprisonment, to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.

Orders

  • Respondent sentenced on Count 2 to imprisonment for 21 months commencing 3 February 2017 and expiring 2 November 2018.
  • Respondent sentenced on Count 3 to imprisonment for 12 months commencing 3 February 2018 and expiring 2 February 2019.