R v KM; R v Linh Van Nguyen; R v John Nguyen; R v John Tran (No.2) [2004] NSWCCA 173
The Court held that the sentence imposed on John Nguyen did not accurately reflect the intention expressed in the judgment and that this error could be corrected under s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act by amending the non-parole period on count 5.
- Parties
- Respondent: KM; Respondent: Linh Van Nguyen; Respondent: John Nguyen; Respondent: John Tran; Appellant: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Correction of Sentence After Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Sentence corrected pursuant to s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sentence Correction, Non Parole Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KM
Respondent
Linh Van Nguyen
Respondent
John Nguyen
Respondent
John Tran
Respondent
Crown
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Correction of Sentence After Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on John Nguyen accurately reflected the Court's intention as stated in the principal judgment
- 2 Whether an error in sentencing could be corrected under s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the sentence imposed on John Nguyen did not accurately reflect the intention expressed in the judgment and that this error could be corrected under s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act by amending the non-parole period on count 5.
Court Disposition
Sentence corrected pursuant to s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act
Orders
- In lieu of the sentence imposed on John Nguyen on count 5 on 18 March 2004, John Nguyen be sentenced as follows on count 5: Imprisonment for five years commencing on 4 November 2002 and expiring on 3 November 2007 with a non-parole period of two years three months commencing on 4 November 2002 and expiring on 3...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment