R v Harris [2001] NSWCCA 322
The sentences were found to be lenient and did not adequately reflect the full criminality, especially given the gravity and number of additional offences taken into account under s 33. However, the court exercised its residual discretion and dismissed the Crown appeal, having regard to the respondent's circumstances and evidence of rehabilitation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Crown Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Crown appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'crown Appeal' 'supply of Prohibited Drugs' 'firearms Offences' 'conspiracy' 'application of S 33 Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Crown Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentences imposed were manifestly inadequate and failed to reflect the gravity of offences, particularly offences taken into account under s 33 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'Principles and proper approach to taking additional offences into account during sentencing under s 33' 'Residual discretion to dismiss a Crown appeal against sentence']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences were found to be lenient and did not adequately reflect the full criminality, especially given the gravity and number of additional offences taken into account under s 33. However, the court exercised its residual discretion and dismissed the Crown appeal, having regard to the respondent's circumstances and evidence of rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Crown appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Crown appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment