R v CAMPBELL [2000] NSWCCA 157

R v CAMPBELL [2000] NSWCCA 157

The sentence imposed by the District Court was manifestly inadequate in light of the objective seriousness of the offence—armed robbery with a loaded shotgun, substantial violence, planning, and injury to a victim—warranting a penalty exceeding the guideline starting point. A higher sentence, mitigated for duplication of jeopardy on a Crown appeal, properly reflects specific and general deterrence and the seriousness of offences under s 98 of the Crimes Act 1900.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Determination of Sentence Appeal
Outcome
Crown appeal allowed, sentence quashed, respondent re-sentenced.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'robbery Whilst Armed With Dangerous Weapon With Wounding' 'application of Guideline Judgment']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'robbery Whilst Armed With Dangerous Weapon With Wounding' 'application of Guideline Judgment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Determination of Sentence Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed by the District Court for robbery whilst armed with a dangerous weapon with wounding was manifestly inadequate' 'Proper application of sentencing guidelines from R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111 to offences under s 98 of the Crimes Act 1900']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed by the District Court was manifestly inadequate in light of the objective seriousness of the offence—armed robbery with a loaded shotgun, substantial violence, planning, and injury to a victim—warranting a penalty exceeding the guideline starting point. A higher sentence, mitigated for duplication of jeopardy on a Crown appeal, properly reflects specific and general deterrence and the seriousness of offences under s 98 of the Crimes Act 1900.

Court Disposition

Crown appeal allowed, sentence quashed, respondent re-sentenced.

Orders

  • ['Sentence imposed by District Court quashed.' 'Respondent sentenced to a minimum term of five and a half years imprisonment from 11 March 1999 to 10 September 2004, with an additional term of two years.' 'Earliest date for parole eligibility fixed at 10 September 2004.' 'Exhibits may be returned.']