R v Skinner [2018] NSWCCA 185
The aggregate sentence, though lenient, was properly informed by findings on the respondent's intellectual disability, which diminished moral culpability and the applicability of deterrence and denunciation. The sentencing judge's assessment of the objective gravity of offences and degree of sentence concurrency was open on the evidence and within discretion. No error warranting intervention was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Crown Appeal Against Inadequacy of Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['crown Appeal' 'aggregate Sentence' 'intellectually Disabled Offender' 'imitation Firearm Offences' 'possess Pistol' 'specially Aggravated Break Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence Whilst Armed' 'kidnapping' 'assessment of Objective Gravity' 'adequacy of Sentence Accumulation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Crown Appeal Against Inadequacy of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the aggregate sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate' 'Proper assessment of objective gravity of kidnapping offence' 'Degree of concurrency or accumulation between sentences' 'Impact of intellectual disability on sentencing principles']
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence, though lenient, was properly informed by findings on the respondent's intellectual disability, which diminished moral culpability and the applicability of deterrence and denunciation. The sentencing judge's assessment of the objective gravity of offences and degree of sentence concurrency was open on the evidence and within discretion. No error warranting intervention was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal brought by the Crown be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment