CRQ v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 153
The applicant does pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children based on findings, and the Tribunal is not satisfied a reasonable person would allow their child direct, unsupervised contact with the applicant; therefore, the refusal to grant a Working with Children Check clearance is confirmed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Decision of the Children's Guardian to refuse clearance confirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check Clearance' 'risk Assessment' 'child Abuse' 'administrative Review Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children' 'Whether the decision to refuse a Working with Children Check clearance should be confirmed' 'Whether conditions can be imposed under section 27 of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant does pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children based on findings, and the Tribunal is not satisfied a reasonable person would allow their child direct, unsupervised contact with the applicant; therefore, the refusal to grant a Working with Children Check clearance is confirmed.
Court Disposition
Decision of the Children's Guardian to refuse clearance confirmed
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian on 19 July 2016 to refuse to grant the applicant a Working with Children Check clearance is confirmed." 'With the exception of expert witnesses and officers of government agencies, the publication or broadcast of the name of any person mentioned in these proceedings or...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment