Luo v Campbell [2022] NSWCATAP 38

Luo v Campbell [2022] NSWCATAP 38

The Tribunal's extensions of time and findings regarding compensation were properly exercised and supported by evidence; current landlords are liable for prior breaches under the lease; no procedural unfairness occurred regarding photographic evidence; water bill was sent late and claim was properly rejected.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Determination
Outcome
appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
['residential Tenancy' 'rent Reduction' 'compensation' 'procedural Fairness' 'extension of Time' "landlord's Obligations"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Internal Appeal / Appeal Determination

  1. 1 ["Whether Tribunal erred in exercising discretion to extend time for tenant's claim" 'Whether Tribunal erred in awarding compensation against landlords who were not responsible for earlier breaches' 'Whether findings regarding compensation were against the weight of evidence' 'Whether procedural fairness was denied regarding admission of evidence' 'Whether Tribunal erred regarding water bill claim']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's extensions of time and findings regarding compensation were properly exercised and supported by evidence; current landlords are liable for prior breaches under the lease; no procedural unfairness occurred regarding photographic evidence; water bill was sent late and claim was properly rejected.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • ['In relation to any error of law, the appeal is dismissed.' 'In relation to errors other than errors of law, leave to appeal is refused and the appeal otherwise dismissed.']