CSE18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1211
The Federal Court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's refusal to extend time for review under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because s 476A(3)(a) expressly prohibits such appeals, resulting in the application being incompetent and dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: CSE18; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed for want of jurisdiction; applicant to pay first respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Appeals, Protection Visa, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CSE18
Applicant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a refusal by the Federal Circuit Court to extend time for review under s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the application for extension of time to appeal is competent
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's refusal to extend time for review under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because s 476A(3)(a) expressly prohibits such appeals, resulting in the application being incompetent and dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed for want of jurisdiction; applicant to pay first respondent's costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs to be assessed by a registrar of this court on a lump sum basis if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment