CSR Ltd v Fairfield City Council and Anor [2001] NSWLEC 118
Jacfin was properly and necessarily joined as a party as it has a direct interest in the dispute arising from its role in the original proceedings and the imposition of conditions benefiting it, and its merit issues are relevant planning considerations in the Court's discretion under s 95A(2). Both notices of motion to remove Jacfin and to strike out merit issues are dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings (land and Environment Court Appeal) / Notices of Motion to Remove Party (joinder) and Strike Out Merit Issues
- Outcome
- Notices of motion (removal of Jacfin and striking out merit issues) dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'removal of Party' 'striking Out Merit Issues']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings (land and Environment Court Appeal) / Notices of Motion to Remove Party (joinder) and Strike Out Merit Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the joinder of Jacfin Pty Ltd as a party was necessary and proper under pt 8 r 8(1)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules 1970' 'Whether the merit issues raised by Jacfin should be struck out as irrelevant to the s 95A application']
Ratio Decidendi
Jacfin was properly and necessarily joined as a party as it has a direct interest in the dispute arising from its role in the original proceedings and the imposition of conditions benefiting it, and its merit issues are relevant planning considerations in the Court's discretion under s 95A(2). Both notices of motion to remove Jacfin and to strike out merit issues are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Notices of motion (removal of Jacfin and striking out merit issues) dismissed.
Orders
- ['The two notices of motion seeking cessation of joinder of the second respondent and striking out of merit issues are dismissed.' 'The notice of motion seeking setting aside of the subpoena is dismissed.' 'The exhibits may be returned.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment