CSU v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 302
Having considered all required statutory criteria, the Tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to children's safety. Even if otherwise, the Tribunal was not satisfied a reasonable person would permit their child unsupervised contact with the applicant. The correct and preferable decision was to confirm the refusal of a clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Decision of the Children's Guardian refusing a clearance is confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'risk Assessment' 'child Abuse Allegations' 'administrative Review' 'protective Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a risk to the safety of children for the purpose of a Working with Children Check clearance under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012' "Whether the Tribunal should confirm the Children's Guardian’s refusal to grant a clearance under the Act" 'Whether the legislative scheme permits conditional clearances']
Ratio Decidendi
Having considered all required statutory criteria, the Tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to children's safety. Even if otherwise, the Tribunal was not satisfied a reasonable person would permit their child unsupervised contact with the applicant. The correct and preferable decision was to confirm the refusal of a clearance.
Court Disposition
Decision of the Children's Guardian refusing a clearance is confirmed.
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian on 24 August 2016 to refuse to grant the applicant a Working with Children Check clearance under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 is confirmed." 'With the exception of expert witnesses and officers of government agencies, the publication or broadcast of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment