Cullen Feng Pty Limited v Woollahra Council [2001] NSWLEC 295
The amended plans are substantially the same as the original proposal. The Court has the power and should exercise its discretion to permit reliance on the amended plans, as the Council has had notice for months, no significant disadvantage is occasioned, and procedural fairness can be maintained. No terms or compensation are necessary given the circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal (class 1) / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Amendment of Plans
- Outcome
- Leave granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans at the hearing; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Development Application Plans' "court's Power and Discretion to Permit Amendment" 'procedural Fairness' 'development Assessment Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal (class 1) / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Amendment of Plans
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Land and Environment Court should grant leave for the Applicant to rely on amended development application plans at the hearing of the appeal' 'Whether the amended plans describe substantially the same development as originally proposed' "Whether the Council's Development Control Plan (DCP) requires re-advertising or notification of the amended plans"]
Ratio Decidendi
The amended plans are substantially the same as the original proposal. The Court has the power and should exercise its discretion to permit reliance on the amended plans, as the Council has had notice for months, no significant disadvantage is occasioned, and procedural fairness can be maintained. No terms or compensation are necessary given the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans at the hearing; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The Applicant shall serve and file its expert evidence by 21 December 2001.' 'The Council shall have until 31 December 2001 to file its expert reports.' 'The Council shall file and serve its Statement of Issues in relation to the amended plans by 10 December 2001.' 'No order as to costs on the motion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment