Currububula Holdings Pty Ltd v Franxton Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 783

Currububula Holdings Pty Ltd v Franxton Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 783

The second, third and fourth defendants, through acquiescence and delegation of conduct to the fifth defendant, were privy to unreasonable conduct in the withdrawal of non-opposition, thereby justifying the award of costs against them.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 August 2005
Procedural Posture
Corporate Dispute / Judgment on Costs
Outcome
Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings ordered to be paid by the second, third and fourth defendants.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'share Ownership' 'voidable Transactions']
['corporations Law' 'equity'] ['costs' 'share Ownership' 'voidable Transactions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporate Dispute / Judgment on Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether second, third and fourth defendants acted unreasonably in allowing proceedings to be initiated and pursued' 'Whether second, third and fourth defendants should be regarded as complicit in the conduct of the fifth defendant']

Ratio Decidendi

The second, third and fourth defendants, through acquiescence and delegation of conduct to the fifth defendant, were privy to unreasonable conduct in the withdrawal of non-opposition, thereby justifying the award of costs against them.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings ordered to be paid by the second, third and fourth defendants.

Orders

  • ["Second, third and fourth defendants to pay plaintiff's costs of the proceedings"]