Gillon v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 277
Although the sentencing judge erred by not recording reasons for departing from the standard non-parole period, the applicant did not establish material sentencing error or that a less severe sentence was warranted. The finding that the offence was mid range was open, the judge had considered the triggering conduct and lack of pre-planning, and there was no error in not finding special circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['recklessly Causing Grievous Bodily Harm' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'objective Seriousness' 'provocation' 'special Circumstances' 'fernando Principles']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to provide reasons for departing from the standard non-parole period.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing the objective seriousness of the offence as mid range.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to consider whether special circumstances existed.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the sentencing judge erred by not recording reasons for departing from the standard non-parole period, the applicant did not establish material sentencing error or that a less severe sentence was warranted. The finding that the offence was mid range was open, the judge had considered the triggering conduct and lack of pre-planning, and there was no error in not finding special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment