Cushman & Wakefield (NSW) Pty Ltd v Farrell (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 62
The rejection of the Calderbank offer by the respondent was not unreasonable; indemnity costs were not warranted for first instance proceedings. However, the appellant's offer of compromise in the appeal proceedings contained a genuine element of compromise and was no less favourable than the outcome; therefore, the appellant is entitled to indemnity costs for 80% of its costs of the appeal from 8 October 2016 onwards. Interest should be paid on judgment sums to be repaid, calculated in accordance with s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) for periods specified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Orders Following Partial Success of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed; costs and interest orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'offers of Compromise' 'calderbank Offers' 'interest on Repayments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Orders Following Partial Success of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be ordered following offers of compromise and Calderbank offers' 'Whether interest payable on repayment of judgment sums after successful appeal' 'What proportion of costs should be awarded to the appellant given partial success']
Ratio Decidendi
The rejection of the Calderbank offer by the respondent was not unreasonable; indemnity costs were not warranted for first instance proceedings. However, the appellant's offer of compromise in the appeal proceedings contained a genuine element of compromise and was no less favourable than the outcome; therefore, the appellant is entitled to indemnity costs for 80% of its costs of the appeal from 8 October 2016 onwards. Interest should be paid on judgment sums to be repaid, calculated in accordance with s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) for periods specified.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed; costs and interest orders made.
Orders
- ["Respondent pay appellant's costs of and incidental to the amended statement of claim on the ordinary basis (excluding costs of the cross-claim in the Court below)." "Respondent pay 80% of appellant's costs of the appeal on the ordinary basis up to and including 7 October 2016 and on the indemnity basis...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment