Petrovski v Port Properties Pty Limited and Anor [2002] NSWSC 976
The Group 1 share entitlement was determined by the premises occupied by F.T.J. Campbell Pty Limited in 1960. The evidence of occupation showed that the pastry shop occupied the area including the disputed 8 sq m, while the area formerly known as 'the library' excluded it. The plaintiff, as holder of the Group 1 shares, was therefore entitled to occupy the shop area marked 'PIZZA' and the disputed 8 sq m. An inquiry as to damages was refused because the plaintiff led no evidence of damage or of circumstances indicating a probability of damage.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Declarations Concerning the Right to Occupy an Area of Company Owned Premises Under Articles of Association, and for an Inquiry as to Damages / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Orders 1 and 2 in the summons made; no order made for an inquiry as to damages; costs submissions to be heard.
- Legal Topics
- ['articles of Association' "shareholders' Occupation Rights" 'declarations' 'inquiry as to Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Claim for Declarations Concerning the Right to Occupy an Area of Company Owned Premises Under Articles of Association, and for an Inquiry as to Damages / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the holder of Group 1 shares numbered 1-6650 or the holder of Group 4 shares numbered 11,601-13,100 had the right to occupy the disputed 8 sq m area at the back of 81-83 Wentworth Street, Port Kembla.' "Whether the Court should order an inquiry into damages for the second defendant's wrongful occupation of the disputed area."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Group 1 share entitlement was determined by the premises occupied by F.T.J. Campbell Pty Limited in 1960. The evidence of occupation showed that the pastry shop occupied the area including the disputed 8 sq m, while the area formerly known as 'the library' excluded it. The plaintiff, as holder of the Group 1 shares, was therefore entitled to occupy the shop area marked 'PIZZA' and the disputed 8 sq m. An inquiry as to damages was refused because the plaintiff led no evidence of damage or of circumstances indicating a probability of damage.
Court Disposition
Orders 1 and 2 in the summons made; no order made for an inquiry as to damages; costs submissions to be heard.
Orders
- ['Orders 1 and 2 in the summons are made.' 'The Court will hear submissions as to costs at a time convenient to all parties.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment