Campbelltown City Council v Josevski [2009] NSWLEC 29
Given that the offence was at the low end of seriousness, the defendant pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity, and there was significant contrition and cooperation as well as limited harm and replacement trees ordered, a fine of $10,000 is appropriate. The offence warrants a conviction, a moderate fine, costs, and tree replacement and maintenance orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Destruction of Trees' 'development Without Consent' 'sentencing for Environmental Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for the poisoning of six trees without development consent in contravention of s 125(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given that the offence was at the low end of seriousness, the defendant pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity, and there was significant contrition and cooperation as well as limited harm and replacement trees ordered, a fine of $10,000 is appropriate. The offence warrants a conviction, a moderate fine, costs, and tree replacement and maintenance orders.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence
Orders
- ['The defendant is convicted.' 'The defendant is fined $10,000, payable within 28 days.' "The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed." 'The defendant to plant six replacement Eucalyptus creba trees of a pot size of 100 litres by 30 April 2009 and maintain them for three years, with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment