CVQ17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 60

CVQ17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 60

The appeal was dismissed with costs for the reasons given by Greenwood J in BJI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 58, with McKerracher and Burley JJ agreeing.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision Affirming Refusal of a Safe Haven Visa / Final Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['immigration Assessment Authority Review' 'safe Haven Visa' 'country Information' 'relocation Within Receiving Country' 'unreliable Information' 'legal Unreasonableness' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision Affirming Refusal of a Safe Haven Visa / Final Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority relied on reports and information contradicted by, and inconsistent with, other cited reports on material issues relating to safety in the receiving country and in a place of relocation within the receiving country' 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority acted upon unreliable information' "Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority's decision was affected by legal unreasonableness"]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed with costs for the reasons given by Greenwood J in BJI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 58, with McKerracher and Burley JJ agreeing.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent of and incidental to the appeal.']