CWG v Children’s Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 99
On the balance of probabilities, after taking into account the mandated considerations under s30(1) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW), there is insufficient evidence to find that the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children that would justify the refusal of a Working with Children Check clearance.
- Parties
- Applicant: CWG; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination – Merits Review
- Outcome
- Decision of Children's Guardian refusing WWCC clearance set aside; applicant granted clearance
- Legal Topics
- Working With Children Check, Risk Assessment, Protective Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CWG
Applicant
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination – Merits Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the refusal of a Working with Children Check clearance is correct and preferable based on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, after taking into account the mandated considerations under s30(1) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW), there is insufficient evidence to find that the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children that would justify the refusal of a Working with Children Check clearance.
Court Disposition
Decision of Children's Guardian refusing WWCC clearance set aside; applicant granted clearance
Orders
- The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 22 November 2016 to refuse to grant the applicant a Working with Children Check clearance is set aside.
- The applicant is granted a Working with Children Check clearance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment