CXS v Children’s Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 351
Given the seriousness and substantiation of some allegations by the Department of Education and Training, the maintaining of applicant’s listing as a person causing harm, and the absence of evidence disproving risk, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to children and affirms the decision to refuse the Working with Children Check clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for review is refused; original decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'risk to Safety of Children' 'review of Administrative Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children such that a Working with Children Check clearance should be refused' "What is the correct and preferable decision on the applicant's review of the refusal decision"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness and substantiation of some allegations by the Department of Education and Training, the maintaining of applicant’s listing as a person causing harm, and the absence of evidence disproving risk, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to children and affirms the decision to refuse the Working with Children Check clearance.
Court Disposition
Application for review is refused; original decision affirmed
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 20 December 2016 to refuse to grant the applicant a Working with Children Check clearance is affirmed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment