CYD16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 213

CYD16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 213

Because s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act prohibits an appeal to the Federal Court from a Federal Circuit Court's refusal to make an order under s 477(2), the application is futile and must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['extension of Time to Appeal' 'jurisdiction of Federal Court' 'interlocutory Decisions Under Migration Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear appeal from interlocutory decision of Federal Circuit Court refusing extension of time under s 477(2) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

Because s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act prohibits an appeal to the Federal Court from a Federal Circuit Court's refusal to make an order under s 477(2), the application is futile and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The application for extension of time filed on 16 August 2018 be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs to be agreed or assessed."]